Case studies: what managed clinical pharmacy has delivered for GP practices and PCNs
Rect5

Case studies: what managed clinical pharmacy has delivered for GP practices and PCNs

Seven case studies in managed clinical pharmacy, from UK GP practices and PCNs. Names withheld as standard. Every practice and PCN below is a customer we invoiced and delivered for. Where a story names a county or an ICB, that is as specific as we go without the customer’s written consent.

Figures are Virtual Pharmacist’s own service data as at August 2026.

  • 375+ practices
  • 88+ PCN services
  • 23 ICBs
  • 7 of 7 NHS regions
  • 100+ pharmacists under one clinical governance framework
  • 85% independent prescribers
  • Since 2021

Why none of these name the practice

We don’t put client names on this website. Not the practice, not the PCN, not a logo on a wall. Several of the practices below would probably agree to it if we asked. We don’t ask, because the answer would be shaped by the fact that we’re the supplier and they’re mid-contract.

That is worth knowing before you read the rest of this page, because it tells you what we would do with your name. A provider who puts other people’s practices on their website will one day do the same with yours.

It does leave you taking our word for the details, so here is what we offer instead.

What you can check for yourself

  • A reference call. Ask, and we will put you on a call with a practice or PCN doing the work you are considering. They can say whatever they like to you. That is the point.
  • The public record. Where a story rests on something published by someone other than us, an ICB tariff, a QOF indicator, a CQC report, we say so and you can go and read it.
  • The method, in full. The search schedule below is the real one, published in full. Compare it with anything else you have been shown.
  • Our own figures, unrounded. 37 of 65. 315 hours. £2,960. We publish the number we counted, not the number that reads well.
  • Scoped, delivered, invoiced. Every case study here was scoped as a defined piece of work, delivered under our own protocols and clinical supervision, and invoiced against what was delivered.

Medicines safety · Northamptonshire · three GP practices

Three inspections on the calendar. Three passed.

CQC inspection reports are published in full Reference call available on request
What was happening

Three practices called us late, separately, each with an inspection date already set and a medicines-safety position it could not evidence. Monitoring the team believed was in hand but could not show. High-risk medicines with no recent record of review. Safety alerts that had been read but never worked through patient by patient.

What we did

Module C, at pace. The full search set was built and run across each practice’s whole registered list, then worked the only way that counts: every flagged patient reviewed individually by a pharmacist, every action taken and coded contemporaneously in the practice’s own clinical system.

What happened

At each practice the full set was built, run and worked through inside two weeks. The fastest cleared in a single week. All three passed their inspections. One of the three went on to commission a rolling medicines-safety programme, over 400 hours of delivered work, and a multi-year technician service.

3 of 3inspections passed
1 weekfastest full clear
400+ hoursof follow-on work delivered

“We are so grateful to you and your team for getting us to this point, and it is a huge relief. CQC commented on the high quality medication reviews that have been undertaken by your team.”

Practice leadership, on publication of the practice’s CQC report

What this is, and what it isn’t. We don’t sell inspection preparation. No mock inspections, no evidence packs, no consultancy reports. None of those change what is on the patient record, which is what gets looked at. What Module C delivers is the substance underneath: the clinical work itself, plus a concise patient-safety summary of the searches run, patients reviewed, actions completed and matters referred. It evidences the care you commissioned, and it may support your practice’s own CQC evidence. This work is available to practices across Northamptonshire and nationally.

Scale · Norfolk & Waveney · PCN

A thousand structured medication reviews in one winter

What was happening

A PCN needed a defined block of structured medication reviews delivered inside a single winter. There was no capacity to recruit for it, and no appetite for an open-ended arrangement that would still be running in the summer.

What we did

1,000 SMRs, commissioned as a counted block on a fixed fee and delivered October to March. Alongside it we ran an AI-supported review workstream and a continuous technician service, all under the same governance and all inside the PCN’s own clinical systems.

What happened

Delivered on time and in full. Volume without losing the individual assessment: every review a real clinical encounter with a documented clinical conclusion, coded on the record as it was done.

1,000SMRs commissioned
Oct to Mardelivered on time
3 workstreamsone PCN, one governance

Self-funding · Derbyshire, then a second ICB · GP practice

The project that paid the practice

The £80 item-of-service is the ICB’s own published tariff Figures unrounded: 37 of 65
What was happening

An ICB enhanced service was paying practices a published £80 item-of-service for each anticoagulant switch. The money was on the table. The clinical time to earn it was not, which is why schemes like this so often go unclaimed.

What we did

We screened the anticoagulant register, then reviewed every screened patient individually and made the switches that were clinically right for that patient. Where a switch was not right, no switch was made, whatever the tariff pays.

What happened

At one practice, 37 of the 65 patients screened were switched. £80 a patient does not sound like much until you multiply it: the practice claimed £2,960. The scheme funded the work and the prescribing saving went back to the system. We then ran the same model in a second ICB.

£2,960claimed by the practice
37 switchesat £80 each
2 ICBssame approach

Schemes like this run in most areas. Finding the one live in yours is part of the job.

Scale · Lincolnshire · nine-practice PCN

Nine practices. One PCN. One clinical standard.

What was happening

Nine practices, nine different positions on medication reviews, and nine separate recruitment problems if the PCN tried to fix it by hiring.

What we did

A defined block of medication reviews, 315 hours of it, scoped across the network and delivered remotely inside each practice’s own clinical system, to one pathway and one clinical standard.

What happened

The block ran, then the PCN moved to a full-year contract covering the whole network. Every practice on the same footing, with nothing to recruit and no rota to manage.

9 practicesone PCN
315 hoursof reviews in the first block
Full yearcontract followed

Network-level medicines work like this is available across Lincolnshire and every other ICB in England.

Quality funding · c.6,000-patient GP practice

A whole QOF register, handed over in August instead of March

Indicators are defined in the published QOF specification Reference call available on request
What was happening

Medicines-related QOF work at a c.6,000-patient practice, spread across many registers, all of it landing on the same clinical team and all of it converging on the same March deadline.

What we did

We mapped the registers against the indicators, agreed the cohort with the practice, and worked it across the year instead of at the end of it. One governed pathway supported around 26 medicines-related QOF indicators, as defined in NHS England’s published QOF guidance.

What happened

Registers worked end to end, with every patient individually assessed and the clinical work coded in the practice’s own system as it went. Submission, personalised care adjustments and dashboard management stayed with the practice, as they always do. We deliver the clinical work behind the indicators. The return stays with your team.

~26medicines-related indicators supported
c.6,000patient list
End to endwhole registers worked

Most practices ask us about this in the March panic. Hand it over in August and the year works itself.

Combined recall lists · Cheshire, the Bristol area and nationwide

Review the patient, not the list

What was happening

Most patients on a recall list sit on more than one of them: the diabetes register, the asthma register, the polypharmacy list, a QOF recall now due. Worked list by list, that is four invitations, four appointments and four chances to DNA.

What we did

We combine the lists and review the patient once. Every condition, every medicine, everything actioned and coded in one sitting. One invitation for the patient, one recall for your team.

What happened

The same governed pathway carried heart-failure reviews in Cheshire, diabetes work in the Bristol area, and a three-year look-back over MHRA safety alerts, re-run patient by patient.

1 invitationnot one per register
1 reviewcovers every list the patient is on
3 yearsof MHRA alerts in one look-back

Retention · nationwide

Bought once, then bought again

The pattern, rather than the project

Our longest-standing practices and PCNs have been with us since 2021: five years of continuous service, renewed year after year. The pattern repeats at every size. One Derbyshire practice commissioned three separate blocks of work in twelve months. A Somerset PCN followed a 287-hour block of medication reviews with an extension. A Kent PCN renewed for 2026/27. A Northamptonshire practice turned a defined 500-review project into a rolling programme and a multi-year technician contract.

Defined work, delivered, then bought again. That is the real audit. And practices are now moving onto longer, multi-year contracts, securing the service for their teams on the strength of what has already been delivered.

“I would fully recommend VP as a remote pharmacist solution.”

PCN Manager, c.90,000 population, with us since 2021
Since 2021our longest relationships
3 repeat buysat one practice in twelve months
Multi-yearnow the direction of travel

The search schedule, published in full

The Northamptonshire case study above rests on this. It is the named schedule of clinical-risk searches that runs across a practice’s whole registered list under Module C, and it is the same seven streams at every practice. Nothing about it is proprietary, so you can hold it up against anything else you have been shown.

Medicines monitoringAround 18 searches covering the bloods and checks that should have happened before the next issue.
High-risk medicines reviewMethotrexate, lithium, amiodarone, anticoagulants and the rest of the list that carries a monitoring obligation.
MHRA and CAS alertsDrug Safety Updates and central alerts, reviewed per affected patient rather than filed as read.
Case-findingPatients whose record suggests a diagnosis that was never coded.
Long-term condition monitoringThe reviews and measurements that fall due across the chronic disease registers.
Medicines optimisationUsage review and medication review where the current regimen is no longer the right one.
Recall and review administrationContacting patients, logging attempts, and chasing the ones who do not come back.

In their words

From senior partners, practice managers and PCN leads, and from patients.

“Since Virtual Pharmacist took on our prescription signing, I get a lunch break… What more do I need to say!”

PD · Senior Partner, GP practice

“It has dramatically reduced the GPs’ workload, they are happy and that makes me happy!”

JH · Practice Manager

“Thank you all for your fantastic work on the CHOL003 indicator so far. You’ve made amazing progress, and we are very grateful.”

J.A. · GP practice, Suffolk · QOF cholesterol programme

“Takes pressure off GPs, adding quality in medicines management.”

RP · Clinical Director, PCN

“We’ve received some positive feedback from one of our GPs regarding the acute requests. They feel it’s working well, are very grateful for the help and have already noticed a difference.”

H.A. · GP surgery, Hampshire

“Appointment was on time and the pharmacist was easy to talk to. Very helpful, polite and informative.”

Patient · telephone appointment, Devon

Twenty minutes, and we’ll tell you which of these applies to you

Send us your list size and the pressure point, and we’ll come back with a fixed-fee scope. If there’s a local scheme that would pay for the work, we’ll tell you what it is and what it’s worth before you commit anything.

And if you want to hear it from a practice rather than from us, ask for a reference call. We’ll arrange one with a client doing the work you’re considering.

Figures are internal Virtual Pharmacist data as at August 2026 and are updated periodically. Testimonials are from Virtual Pharmacist service feedback records, lightly edited for length; attributions anonymised. Winner: Pharmacy Solutions Provider 2025, General Practice Awards.

QOF, IIF and local incentive income depends on current rules, patient eligibility, coding and wider practice achievement. QOF, local incentive and commissioner returns, personalised care adjustments and dashboard management always stay with your team. Funding eligibility varies by area and year and must be confirmed locally.

Virtual Pharmacist’s services are provided as managed clinical services under Virtual Pharmacist’s protocols; they are not a supply of staff. The patient-safety summary provided under Module C evidences the clinical service delivered; it is not a CQC consultancy, inspection-readiness product or regulatory assurance opinion. Read our clinical governance and data security framework.

Virtual Pharmacist Ltd. Registered in England and Wales, company no. 13258094. Registered office: Queen Street Chambers, 68 Queen Street, Sheffield S1 1WR.